Connect with us

Faith

Texas County Delivers Four-Word Reply to Ten Commandments Demand

Published

on

Faith Facts

  • Van Zandt County Commissioners in Texas responded to the Freedom From Religion Foundation’s demand to remove a Ten Commandments monument with a four-word reply: “come and take it”
  • The county erected the Ten Commandments display on the courthouse lawn in February, citing the monument’s historical and legal significance to American law
  • The phrase “come and take it” references the 1835 Battle of Gonzales during the Texas Revolution, representing Texas’s tradition of defending rights and freedoms

A Texas county has drawn a line in the sand over religious liberty, refusing to bow to pressure from a secular advocacy group demanding removal of the Ten Commandments from public property. Van Zandt County Commissioners delivered a defiant four-word response rooted in Texas history: “come and take it.”

The Freedom From Religion Foundation sent a letter to Van Zandt County officials demanding the removal of a Ten Commandments monument recently erected on the courthouse lawn in Canton, Texas. The Wisconsin-based organization claimed the display violated the constitutional separation of church and state.

County officials rejected that argument outright. Through their attorney, the commissioners responded that the monument serves an educational and historical purpose, recognizing the Ten Commandments’ foundational role in American legal tradition. The display includes historical context explaining its significance in the development of Western law and the American justice system.

The phrase “come and take it” carries deep significance in Texas culture. It originated during the 1835 Battle of Gonzales, the first military engagement of the Texas Revolution. When Mexican forces demanded Texans surrender a small cannon, the colonists responded with a flag bearing the cannon’s image and the words “Come and Take It,” then successfully defended their position.

This historical reference underscores the county’s determination to resist what officials view as government overreach and attacks on religious expression in the public square. For many in the county, the monument represents not only the moral foundation of American law but also the right of communities to acknowledge their religious heritage.

The county’s legal position rests on several Supreme Court precedents, including the 2005 case Van Orden v. Perry. In that decision, the Court ruled that a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of the Texas State Capitol was constitutional, recognizing the historical and educational context of such displays.

Van Zandt County officials argue their monument follows the same constitutional guidelines. The display presents the Ten Commandments within a broader historical framework, explaining their influence on legal codes throughout history. This contextual approach has proven successful in defending similar monuments against legal challenges nationwide.

The Freedom From Religion Foundation has targeted similar displays across the country for decades, sending demand letters to municipalities and filing lawsuits when their requests are denied. The organization maintains that any government acknowledgment of religious texts violates the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause.

However, conservative legal scholars and religious liberty advocates argue the Constitution protects, rather than prohibits, such acknowledgments of America’s religious heritage. They contend that the founders never intended to scrub all religious references from public life, but rather to prevent the establishment of a national church or the coercion of religious belief.

The dispute highlights a broader cultural battle over the role of faith in American public life. For traditional communities like Van Zandt County, displays of the Ten Commandments represent an acknowledgment of the moral principles that shaped the nation’s founding. For secular activists, they represent an unconstitutional government endorsement of religion.

Van Zandt County, located about 60 miles east of Dallas, has a population of approximately 60,000 residents. The largely rural county reflects the conservative values common to much of Texas, where public expressions of faith remain deeply woven into community life.

County officials have indicated they are prepared to defend their position in court if necessary. They view the monument as an important educational tool and a recognition of the foundational principles that have guided American justice for centuries.

The case joins a growing number of similar disputes across the nation as communities push back against efforts to remove religious symbols and references from public spaces. From nativity scenes to crosses on public land, these battles reflect fundamental disagreements about the relationship between faith and government in American society.

For supporters of the Van Zandt County monument, the county’s response represents a welcome stand for religious liberty and local self-governance. They see it as a defense of the right of communities to honor their values and history without interference from outside advocacy groups.

As the dispute continues, Van Zandt County has become a symbol of resistance to what many conservatives view as an aggressive campaign to erase Christian influence from American public life. The county’s willingness to fight for its monument has earned praise from religious liberty organizations and citizens who believe America’s religious heritage deserves recognition and protection.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Faith

Chinese Authorities Threaten Pastor’s Children to Force False Confession

Published

on

Faith Facts

  • Pastor Liu Zhenbin remains detained in China as authorities continue their crackdown on unregistered Christian congregations
  • Communist officials attempted to coerce a confession by invoking threats regarding the pastor’s young children
  • The persecution highlights the ongoing assault on religious freedom under China’s authoritarian regime

Pastor Liu Zhenbin, a Christian minister held captive by Chinese authorities, has revealed disturbing details about the tactics being used against him as Communist officials intensify their campaign against unregistered churches. The pastor disclosed that prosecutors stooped to using his own children as leverage in an attempt to force him into making a false confession.

The detention of Pastor Liu represents yet another chapter in China’s escalating war on religious freedom, particularly targeting Christians who refuse to bow to state-controlled worship. His unregistered congregation has faced systematic harassment and persecution simply for gathering to worship according to their biblical convictions rather than government mandates.

By threatening a father through his children, Chinese authorities have demonstrated the depths to which totalitarian regimes will sink to suppress faith and control their citizens. This manipulation of family bonds reveals the moral bankruptcy of a system that views religious devotion as a threat to state power.

The pastor’s courage in standing firm despite these unconscionable tactics serves as an inspiration to believers worldwide and a sobering reminder of the price many Christians pay for their faith. While American Christians enjoy constitutional protections for religious liberty, brothers and sisters in Christ around the world face imprisonment, torture, and death for refusing to renounce their Savior.

China’s Communist Party has dramatically increased its persecution of Christians in recent years, demolishing church buildings, imprisoning pastors, and demanding that congregations register with the government and submit to state oversight. Unregistered churches that insist on maintaining their independence and biblical integrity face the harshest treatment.

The case of Pastor Liu underscores the urgent need for American Christians to pray for the persecuted church and for our government to maintain strong pressure on China regarding human rights violations. Religious freedom is not a luxury or a cultural preference—it is a fundamental human right grounded in the recognition that people are created in the image of God.

As believers in the free world, we must not take our freedoms for granted while our fellow Christians suffer under oppressive regimes. The faith that sustains Pastor Liu in his cell is the same faith that calls us to stand in solidarity with all who face persecution for the name of Jesus Christ.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Continue Reading

Faith

Missouri Fire Station Caves to Atheist Pressure Group

Published

on

Faith Facts

  • A Missouri fire station removed a Christian flag after receiving a demand letter from the Freedom From Religion Foundation
  • The atheist advocacy group argued the Christian flag violated constitutional separation of church and state
  • The flag had been displayed alongside the American flag at the fire station before removal

A Missouri fire department has removed a Christian flag from public display following pressure from a national atheist organization. The flag came down after the station received a legal demand letter from the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF), a Wisconsin-based group known for targeting religious displays on public property across the nation.

The FFRF’s letter claimed the Christian flag violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The organization argued that displaying the flag at a taxpayer-funded fire station constituted government endorsement of Christianity, which they contend is unconstitutional.

The Christian flag, which features a blue canton with a red cross on a white field, had been displayed at the fire station alongside the American flag. The flag is recognized worldwide as a symbol of Christian faith and unity among believers.

Fire department officials made the decision to remove the flag rather than engage in what could have been a prolonged legal battle with the atheist group. The FFRF has built a reputation for sending demand letters to municipalities, schools, and government agencies nationwide, threatening litigation over religious symbols and expressions of faith in public spaces.

This incident represents another example of how small communities face increasing pressure to remove Christian symbols from public view. Critics of such efforts argue that removing religious symbols doesn’t promote neutrality but instead promotes hostility toward faith, particularly Christianity.

The controversy highlights ongoing tensions between religious freedom and increasingly aggressive interpretations of the separation of church and state. While the Constitution prohibits government establishment of religion, many Americans believe it also protects the free exercise of faith, including the display of religious symbols that reflect the values and heritage of local communities.

Supporters of keeping the Christian flag argue that such displays honor America’s Christian heritage and reflect the beliefs of the majority of Americans who identify as Christian. They contend that removing these symbols erases an important part of American identity and culture.

The Freedom From Religion Foundation continues to actively seek out religious displays on government property across the country, sending hundreds of complaint letters annually. The organization’s aggressive tactics have made it a controversial figure in debates over religious liberty and the proper role of faith in public life.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Continue Reading

Faith

Missionary Shares One Truth That Changes Everything About Your Walk With God

Published

on

Faith Facts

  • Jemima Ooi, co-founder of Love in Action Mission Global, addressed approximately 4,000 young Christians at Arise Asia in Manila
  • Ooi challenged believers to view God as a companion rather than a destination, emphasizing relationship over achievement
  • The missionary taught that true purpose flows from God’s presence, not from striving to reach spiritual goals

A powerful message delivered to thousands of young believers in the Philippines is resonating across Asia this week. Jemima Ooi, co-founder of Love in Action Mission Global based in Singapore, spoke to approximately 4,000 young Christians gathered in Manila on Tuesday evening with a truth that cuts through much of modern Christian confusion.

Ooi challenged the audience to rethink the very foundation of their faith walk. She explained that the central mistake many Christians make is treating God as a destination to reach rather than a companion to walk with daily.

“God can do a lot with a willing heart,”

Ooi told the gathering, emphasizing the power of simple availability to the Lord.

The missionary’s message focused on a critical distinction often lost in contemporary Christian culture: the difference between pursuing purpose and pursuing God’s presence. While purpose has become a buzzword in churches worldwide, Ooi reframed it as something that naturally flows from relationship rather than something to be grasped through effort.

According to her teaching, purpose — however important it may be — is best understood as a byproduct of God’s presence in our lives. This perspective shifts the focus from what we can accomplish for God to who we become with God.

The Arise Asia gathering represents a significant moment for Christian youth across the region. In an era when young people face unprecedented pressure and competing worldviews, events like this provide grounding in biblical truth and Christian community.

Ooi’s ministry, Love in Action Mission Global, has been spreading the Gospel throughout Asia, demonstrating that faithful witness combined with compassionate service continues to bear fruit in regions hungry for hope. Her message in Manila reflects the timeless biblical principle that knowing God precedes serving God effectively.

The teaching resonates particularly well with a generation often told to find their purpose, build their platform, or make their mark. Ooi’s counter-cultural message reminds believers that Christianity begins not with what we do, but with whom we follow — and that the presence of the living God transforms ordinary willingness into extraordinary impact.

For young Christians navigating an increasingly secular world, this message offers both relief and empowerment. Relief from the pressure to manufacture spiritual significance, and empowerment through the promise that God works powerfully through hearts simply willing to say yes to His leading.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Continue Reading

Trending