Family
Study Reveals Hidden Risks of Abortion Pill
In a world where the sanctity of life is often overshadowed by modern conveniences, a recent study by the Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC) sheds light on the alarming realities of the abortion pill, mifepristone. This study, which is the largest-known review of its kind in the United States, reveals that one in ten women experience a “serious adverse event” after taking this pill. This figure starkly contrasts with the “less than 0.5%” adverse event rate reported in clinical trials by the drug’s manufacturer, Danco Laboratories.
The EPPC’s findings are a clarion call for truth and transparency. Their analysis, based on real-world data from 865,727 mifepristone abortions between 2017 and 2023, shows a serious adverse event rate of 10.93%. This is at least 22 times higher than the misleading summary figure on the drug label. As the EPPC rightly points out, “Simply stated, mifepristone, as used in real-world conditions, is not ‘safe and effective.'”
This revelation comes at a critical time when many states are implementing pro-life laws following the Supreme Court’s historic decision to overturn Roe v. Wade in June 2022. Yet, despite these efforts to protect life, the use of telehealth services to bypass abortion bans has surged, with telehealth accounting for 19% of abortions in the U.S. healthcare system as of December 2023.
The increase in abortion rates, fueled by the widespread availability of the abortion pill, is a sobering reminder of the need to uphold the values of life and family. In 2023 alone, the abortion pill accounted for 63% of all abortions, a statistic that should prompt us to reflect on the moral and ethical implications of such practices.
Despite these concerning findings, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary has stated that he has “no plans to take action” to limit the availability of mifepristone. This inaction underscores the importance of advocating for policies that prioritize the health and well-being of women and the unborn.
The EPPC’s study, authored by President Ryan T. Anderson and Director of Data Analysis Jamie Bryan Hall, is a testament to the power of truth in shaping public discourse. It challenges us to question the narratives that downplay the risks associated with abortion and to champion a culture that values life at every stage.
As we navigate these complex issues, let us remain steadfast in our commitment to faith, family, and freedom. By doing so, we honor the principles that have long been the foundation of our nation and ensure a future where every life is cherished and protected.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
Family
Former Iranian Prisoner Saeed Abedini Faces Court Order on Daughter’s Custody
Faith Facts
- Saeed Abedini, who was imprisoned in Iran for his Christian faith in the 2010s, has been ordered by a Virginia federal court to return his 5-year-old daughter to her mother in Turkey.
- The custody case highlights ongoing legal challenges facing the former prisoner of conscience following his release and return to the United States.
- Abedini became an international symbol of religious persecution after being detained in Iran for his Christian ministry work.
A federal court in Virginia has issued an order requiring Saeed Abedini to return his 5-year-old daughter to her mother, who currently resides in Turkey. The ruling comes years after Abedini gained international attention as a prisoner of conscience in Iran.
Abedini’s imprisonment in Iran during the 2010s made him a prominent figure in discussions about religious freedom and persecution of Christians worldwide. His case drew support from Christian communities across America and became a focal point for advocates of international religious liberty.
The custody dispute represents a personal struggle for the former prisoner, whose faith journey has been marked by both suffering and public scrutiny. The court’s decision adds another chapter to Abedini’s complex story following his release from Iranian captivity.
Details surrounding the custody arrangement and the circumstances leading to the court’s decision were not immediately available. The case underscores the ongoing challenges many families face when navigating international custody disputes.
Abedini’s story has resonated deeply with American Christians who followed his imprisonment and advocated for his release. His experience in Iranian prisons highlighted the dangers faced by believers who share their faith in hostile environments.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
Family
Faith-Based Studio Launches Clean Comedy That Families Can Actually Watch Together
Faith Facts
- Wonder Project, known for faith-based films, is expanding into stand-up comedy with a focus on clean, family-friendly content
- Comedian Sterling Scott says the move reflects growing audience demand for entertainment that unites families rather than divides them
- The initiative represents a counter-cultural push against Hollywood’s trend toward increasingly crude and divisive comedy programming
In an entertainment landscape where family-friendly content has become increasingly scarce, Wonder Project is making a bold bet that Americans are hungry for comedy they can actually watch with their children. The faith-based studio, already known for its commitment to values-driven films and television, is now venturing into stand-up comedy with a revolutionary premise: you can be hilarious without being vulgar.
Comedian Sterling Scott, who is part of this groundbreaking initiative, says the studio’s first slate of comedy specials reflects a genuine shift in what audiences want. Too often, families find themselves scrolling endlessly through streaming services, unable to find content that everyone can enjoy together without cringing or explaining inappropriate jokes to their kids.
“Welcome everyone in,” Scott emphasized, capturing the inclusive spirit that drives this venture.
This approach stands in stark contrast to the current state of mainstream comedy, where profanity, sexual content, and attacks on traditional values have become the default setting. The comedy industry has spent years telling us that clean comedy can’t be funny, that pushing boundaries means pushing decency aside, and that faith and family values are incompatible with genuine humor.
Wonder Project is proving them wrong. By investing in comedians who can craft intelligent, observational humor without resorting to shock value, the studio is tapping into a massive, underserved market: American families who still believe that entertainment should uplift rather than degrade, unite rather than divide.
The timing couldn’t be better. As cultural divisions deepen and Hollywood continues to alienate conservative and faith-oriented audiences, there’s a growing appetite for content that reflects traditional American values. Parents are tired of having to pre-screen every show, tired of being ambushed by content that contradicts what they’re teaching their children, and tired of comedy that punches down at their beliefs.
This initiative also represents an important economic reality that Hollywood often ignores: faith-based and family-friendly content consistently outperforms expectations at the box office and on streaming platforms. When given the choice, American families will choose entertainment that aligns with their values, and they’ll support it with their wallets.
The success of clean comedy also demonstrates something fundamental about humor itself. The best comedy has always come from keen observation of human nature, clever wordplay, and finding the absurd in everyday life—none of which requires vulgarity or moral compromise. Comedians like Jim Gaffigan and Brian Regan have built massive careers proving this point.
Wonder Project’s expansion into stand-up comedy is more than just a business decision; it’s a cultural statement. It says that American families deserve better, that faith and humor aren’t mutually exclusive, and that there’s still room in our entertainment landscape for content that brings people together rather than driving them apart.
As streaming platforms continue to fragment audiences and mainstream entertainment drifts further from traditional values, initiatives like this offer hope that the market will ultimately reward those who respect their audience’s faith and values. The question isn’t whether clean comedy can succeed—it’s whether Hollywood will pay attention when it does.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
Family
What Modern Culture Gets Wrong About Grief
Faith Facts
- Grief is a natural, God-given process that cannot be rushed or scheduled according to modern expectations
- Scripture teaches there is “a time to weep and a time to mourn” (Ecclesiastes 3:4), acknowledging grief’s necessary season
- Contemporary culture’s demand for quick emotional recovery contradicts biblical wisdom about the healing power of time and community support
In a world obsessed with efficiency and productivity, grief has become one more thing we’re expected to rush through. Modern society seems uncomfortable with extended mourning, pushing those who’ve lost loved ones to “move on” and “get back to normal” on a timeline that serves everyone’s comfort except the griever’s.
But grief doesn’t follow our schedule. It doesn’t respect our deadlines or our desire for neat resolution.
The Bible offers a radically different perspective on loss and mourning. Scripture doesn’t minimize pain or demand we suppress it quickly. Instead, it acknowledges that grief has its own season—one that cannot and should not be artificially shortened.
Ecclesiastes 3:4 reminds us there is “a time to weep and a time to mourn.” This isn’t a suggestion to indulge in endless despair, but a recognition that mourning is a necessary, God-ordained part of the human experience.
The psalmists regularly express deep anguish and sorrow, modeling for us that bringing our pain before God is both healthy and holy. David wrote honestly about his tears, his sleepless nights, and his overwhelming grief—and these expressions became Scripture.
Yet our contemporary culture treats grief like an inconvenient interruption to productivity. Bereavement leave at most jobs offers just a few days, as if the loss of a spouse, parent, or child could be processed in less time than it takes to recover from the flu.
Social expectations are often worse. After the funeral, after the casseroles stop coming, grieving people frequently report feeling abandoned by their communities. Friends and family members grow uncomfortable with continued sadness, offering platitudes like “they’re in a better place” or “at least you had time together” rather than simply sitting with someone in their pain.
This rush to resolve grief does real damage. Research consistently shows that suppressed or hurried grief leads to complicated bereavement, depression, anxiety, and even physical health problems. When we don’t allow ourselves or others the time needed to properly mourn, we don’t eliminate the pain—we just drive it underground where it causes different kinds of harm.
The Christian response should be different. We should be the people who understand that healing takes time, that resurrection comes after the tomb, and that pretending everything is fine doesn’t honor God—it dishonors the reality He created.
Our faith communities should be places where people can grieve openly for as long as they need to. Where saying “I’m still struggling” six months or a year after a loss is met with compassion, not judgment. Where we follow the biblical model of mourning with those who mourn rather than rushing them toward joy they’re not ready to feel.
This doesn’t mean wallowing in despair or rejecting the hope we have in Christ. The resurrection is real, and Christian grief is indeed different because we grieve “not as others do who have no hope” (1 Thessalonians 4:13). But hope doesn’t eliminate sorrow—it reframes it.
We can simultaneously believe in eternal life and miss someone desperately. We can trust in God’s goodness and still feel the sharp sting of loss. These aren’t contradictions; they’re the tension of living in a fallen world while holding onto heavenly promises.
What the grieving need isn’t a timeline or a deadline. They need permission to take the time they need. They need communities that will walk with them through the valley of the shadow of death, not just to the edge of it.
They need churches that remember them after the funeral, friends who continue to check in months later, and a culture that values emotional health over the appearance of having it all together.
Grief deserves its season. Not because we’re without hope, but because we’re human, and the losses we experience are real and significant. Rushing through grief doesn’t demonstrate faith—it demonstrates a lack of understanding about how God designed us to process pain.
Let us be people who give grief the space it needs, who trust that healing happens in God’s time rather than ours, and who create communities where mourning is met with patience, presence, and prayer.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
-
Self-Reliance1 year agoTrump’s Bold Move Uncovers Massive Social Security Fraud
-
Faith1 year agoNew Clues Emerge in Noah’s Ark Mystery
-
News1 year agoGovernor Walz’s Rhetoric Sparks National Controversy
-
News1 year agoMel Gibson’s ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Sequel Title Announced
-
Family1 year agoTexas Lawmaker Targets Furries in Schools
-
Freedom1 year agoMaine Lawmaker Challenges Sports Fairness Controversy
-
Family1 year agoCanada’s Controversial Policy Sparks Ethical Debate
-
Faith8 months ago
Congress Hears Pleas for Nigerian Christians
