News
Urgent Push to Curb the Adult Entertainment Industry
In a decisive and morally driven move, Brent Leatherwood, president of the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC), has called for the complete abolition of the pornography industry. This bold stance aligns with the values that many Christian conservatives hold dear—protecting the sanctity of family, upholding moral integrity, and safeguarding the vulnerable, particularly women and children.
Leatherwood’s call to action follows a disturbing report that unveiled Pornhub’s alleged involvement in profiting from exploitative content, including videos of children subjected to nonconsensual acts. This revelation serves as “irrefutable evidence,” according to Leatherwood, that the pornography industry is not only “immoral” but “predatory, lawless, and deeply dependent on abuse.”
“Pornography isn’t merely immoral,” Leatherwood emphasized. “It’s exploitative. It’s violent. It’s corrosive to relationships, harmful to children, and toxic to a culture that claims to value consent, freedom, and human dignity.”
In a society where freedoms are cherished, Leatherwood argues that these freedoms must be guarded by moral boundaries. He outlines several reform measures aimed at the “complete dismantling of the pornography industry,” including the implementation of stringent age-verification laws and the criminalization of hosting or monetizing nonconsensual, trafficked, or abusive material. Moreover, he suggests classifying commercial pornography as a public health threat, a move that would underscore the industry’s detrimental impact on society.
While acknowledging that the “political will to abolish pornography outright likely doesn’t yet exist,” Leatherwood highlights a promising legislative effort led by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah. The proposed Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA) seeks to modernize the definition of obscenity under the Communications Act of 1934, adapting it for the internet age. This bill would expand the definition of obscene content to include material that lacks literary, artistic, political, or scientific value and is intended to arouse or gratify sexual desires.
“This isn’t about nostalgia for a bygone era or imposing religious rules on secular society,” Leatherwood stated. “This is about whether we’ll defend the vulnerable, preserve the dignity of the human person, and build a culture worthy of our children.”
Leatherwood’s stance is not an isolated one. The Southern Baptist Convention has consistently spoken out against pornography, passing a resolution in 2015 titled “On Pornography and Sexual Purity.” This resolution called on government authorities to enact and enforce laws that restrict all forms of pornography, especially those exploiting minors.
The ERLC, under Leatherwood’s leadership, continues to uphold its commitment to religious liberty and traditional values. A letter signed by ten former SBC presidents praised the ERLC for its steadfast defense of Southern Baptist principles, particularly in its opposition to Roe v. Wade, transgender ideology, and pornography, while promoting life, marriage, and family values.
“For decades, the ERLC has steadfastly defended our Southern Baptist commitment to religious liberty. They forged a path forward fighting abortion, helping pave the way to see Roe v. Wade overturned and now Planned Parenthood defunded. They are continuing to battle transgender ideology and pornography and to promote biblical values regarding marriage, family, and sexuality. All Southern Baptists owe a debt of gratitude to the historical work of the ERLC.”
In a world where moral clarity is often blurred, Leatherwood’s call to ban pornography is a rallying cry for those who believe in the power of faith, family, and freedom to shape a society grounded in biblical principles. It’s a reminder that true freedom is found not in the absence of restraint but in the presence of righteousness.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
Faith Facts
- Pete Greig, founder of 24-7 Prayer, addressed the Wildfires festival calling for prayer regarding national defense.
- Alan Storkey argues that increased military spending conflicts with the Christian call to peace.
- The discussion highlights ongoing tensions between traditional Christian values of peace and national security concerns.
During a recent appearance at the Wildfires festival, Pete Greig, leader of 24-7 Prayer, urged Christians to pray for peace while also calling on the UK Prime Minister to increase defense spending. The remarks sparked debate among believers about how faith communities should respond to growing global instability.
Alan Storkey, a Christian commentator, responded to Greig’s message by questioning whether higher military budgets align with the Gospel’s emphasis on peace. Storkey argues that Christians have a responsibility to seek solutions that reduce conflict rather than prepare for it.
“Prepare for war,” Greig stated during his talk, emphasizing the need for stronger national defense in uncertain times.
Storkey counters that such an approach risks escalating tensions rather than resolving them. He suggests that prayer for wisdom in foreign policy and diplomatic solutions should take precedence over increased military expenditure.
The exchange reflects broader conversations within Christian circles about how believers should engage with issues of war, peace, and government policy. Many traditional Christians continue to wrestle with balancing national security concerns against biblical calls for peacemaking.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
Faith Facts
- Samuel Rodriguez is a prominent Hispanic evangelical leader focused on faith, family, and freedom.
- Conservative values emphasize personal responsibility, limited government, and secure borders.
- Latino voters have historically prioritized faith-based principles and traditional American ideals.
Samuel Rodriguez, president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, warned that Republican candidates could face significant Latino voter abstention during the 2026 midterm elections. He attributes this risk to rising living costs and the Trump administration’s firm immigration policies.
"Hispanic Evangelical leader Samuel Rodriguez believes conservatives could most certainly lose ground with Latino voters in the 2026 midterm elections through what he calls votes of abstention as the community struggles with higher costs of living and the Trump administration’s aggressive immigration enforcement."
Rodriguez highlights that many Latino families are feeling financial strain from inflation and everyday expenses. These pressures, combined with strict border enforcement, may lead some voters to stay home on election day.
"Hispanic Evangelical leader Samuel Rodriguez believes conservatives could most certainly lose ground with Latino voters in the 2026 midterm elections through what he calls votes of abstention as the community struggles with higher costs of living and the Trump administration’s aggressive immigration enforcement."
While acknowledging the importance of border security, Rodriguez urges Republican leaders to communicate their policies with compassion and clarity to maintain support among faith-minded Latino voters.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
Faith Facts
- Scripture warns against false witness and calls believers to defend truth with love and clarity.
- Christian teaching upholds the unique biblical connection of the Jewish people to the land of Israel.
- Faithful Christians are called to stand with Israel and reject rhetoric that distorts history or stirs division.
Former President Barack Obama recently told an audience in Belfast that the Jews “took land off people” and were “excessive.” The remarks drew swift and pointed criticism from Elisha Wiesel, son of the late Nobel laureate Elie Wiesel. Wiesel’s public response highlighted the troubling nature of the former president’s language.
Christians who hold to the authority of Scripture recognize that such statements misrepresent both history and God’s covenant promises. The Bible consistently affirms the Jewish people’s connection to the land of Israel, from Genesis through the prophets.
“It is dangerous for a former president of the United States to use such language,” Elisha Wiesel stated.
The comment comes amid ongoing global debates over Israel’s right to exist and defend itself. Many American believers see these discussions as spiritual as well as political, rooted in the promises recorded in Scripture.
“Words have consequences, especially when spoken by those who once held the highest office in our nation,” Wiesel added.
Faithful Christians are increasingly vocal in their support for Israel and their concern over rhetoric that echoes historic patterns of blame. Standing with the Jewish people remains a matter of biblical conviction for many American believers.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
-
Self-Reliance2 years agoTrump’s Bold Move Uncovers Massive Social Security Fraud
-
Faith2 years agoNew Clues Emerge in Noah’s Ark Mystery
-
News2 years agoGovernor Walz’s Rhetoric Sparks National Controversy
-
News2 years agoMel Gibson’s ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Sequel Title Announced
-
Family2 years agoTexas Lawmaker Targets Furries in Schools
-
Freedom2 years agoMaine Lawmaker Challenges Sports Fairness Controversy
-
Family1 year agoCanada’s Controversial Policy Sparks Ethical Debate
-
Faith11 months ago
Congress Hears Pleas for Nigerian Christians