Faith
The Question Every American Should Be Asking This Easter
Faith Facts
- Leading atheist scholar Bart Ehrman and Christian columnist Ross Douthat recently debated the historical evidence for Christ’s resurrection on The New York Times podcast
- The discussion centered on whether eyewitness testimony and historical documentation provide credible proof of Jesus rising from the dead
- Both participants acknowledged the debate’s respectful tone, though fundamental disagreements about faith and evidence remained unresolved
In a rare moment of civil discourse on one of Christianity’s most foundational claims, New York Times columnist Ross Douthat and renowned skeptic Bart Ehrman engaged in a thoughtful exchange about the resurrection of Jesus Christ. The conversation, hosted on a Times podcast, tackled head-on what believers have proclaimed for two millennia: that Jesus physically rose from the dead three days after His crucifixion.
Douthat, a practicing Catholic and author, defended the historical credibility of the resurrection accounts found in the Gospels. Ehrman, a former evangelical Christian turned agnostic scholar specializing in the New Testament, presented the skeptical case that has made him a leading voice among those who question Christianity’s central miracle.
The debate centered on how we evaluate ancient testimony and whether the eyewitness accounts recorded in Scripture meet the standard of historical evidence. For millions of American Christians, this isn’t merely an academic question—it’s the bedrock of their faith and the foundation upon which Western civilization was built.
What made this exchange particularly valuable was its respectful tone in an era when discussions about faith often devolve into mockery or dismissal. Both men engaged seriously with the evidence and with each other’s positions, demonstrating that profound disagreements need not result in personal attacks.
Yet as observer Andy Kind noted, the conversation ultimately left the biggest questions unresolved. This shouldn’t surprise us. The resurrection of Christ has always required a step of faith—not blind faith divorced from reason, but faith informed by historical testimony, personal experience, and the witness of billions across two thousand years.
For Christians, the evidence is compelling: the empty tomb, the transformed disciples willing to die for what they claimed to have seen, the explosion of the early church despite brutal persecution, and the consistent testimony of multiple eyewitness accounts. These aren’t fairy tales passed down through generations of telephone—they’re recorded testimonies from people who claimed to have encountered the risen Christ.
The skeptic demands different standards of proof, often ones that no ancient event could satisfy. Yet the same historical methods that validate other ancient claims are dismissed when applied to the resurrection. This reveals that the debate is often less about evidence and more about whether one is willing to accept that God can intervene in human history.
As we approach Easter, when Christians worldwide celebrate the resurrection, this conversation reminds us why this question matters. If Christ rose from the dead, everything changes. Death is defeated, sin is conquered, and hope is assured. If He didn’t, as Paul himself acknowledged, our faith is in vain.
The Douthat-Ehrman exchange demonstrates that reasonable people can examine the same evidence and reach different conclusions. But it also shows that the question refuses to go away. Generation after generation returns to it because the implications are too profound to ignore.
For American Christians navigating an increasingly secular culture, respectful engagement with skeptics like Ehrman is valuable. It sharpens our understanding, tests our reasoning, and reminds us that faith and intellect need not be enemies. It also demonstrates to a watching world that Christianity can defend itself in the marketplace of ideas.
The resurrection isn’t a claim that requires us to check our brains at the church door. It’s a historical assertion open to investigation, supported by testimony, and ultimately confirmed in the lives of those who encounter the risen Christ personally.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
Faith
When Power Corrupts: What Christians Must Do Differently
Faith Facts
- Recent high-profile abuse scandals reveal a pattern of power misuse across institutions, including churches
- Christians are called to examine their own use of power and influence, no matter how small
- Scripture provides a clear model for servant leadership that heals rather than harms
In an age marked by scandal after scandal involving powerful figures abusing their positions, it’s tempting for believers to grow discouraged. From corporate boardrooms to political offices, and tragically even within church walls, stories of exploitation and harm have become all too common. But Patrick Regan argues that this cultural moment presents Christians with a crucial opportunity for self-examination and transformation.
The pattern is unmistakable: those entrusted with authority often use it to serve themselves rather than those in their care. This betrayal of trust damages not only individual victims but undermines faith in institutions themselves. For Christians, these revelations should prompt serious reflection about how we wield whatever influence God has given us.
“We should take the opportunity to examine ourselves, and ask how we can use whatever power and influence we have to heal, not hurt,” Regan emphasizes.
This isn’t just about high-profile leaders. Every Christian exercises some form of power or influence—whether in our families, workplaces, churches, or communities. The question isn’t whether we have power, but how we use it. Do we leverage our positions to build others up, or do we subtly manipulate situations for our own benefit?
The biblical model stands in stark contrast to worldly power structures. Jesus himself, though possessing all authority, chose the path of servant leadership. He washed his disciples’ feet, touched lepers, and ultimately laid down his life. This is the pattern Christians are called to follow—using whatever influence we have not for personal gain, but for the good of others and the glory of God.
In practical terms, this means accountability. It means creating structures that prevent abuse rather than enabling it. It means listening to those with less power and taking their concerns seriously. It means choosing transparency over secrecy, and service over status.
The healing our culture desperately needs won’t come from new laws alone, though proper governance matters. Real transformation comes when people of faith model a different way—when Christians demonstrate that power and abuse don’t have to go together. We can show a watching world that authority exercised in submission to Christ looks radically different from worldly power plays.
This is our opportunity. Rather than becoming cynical or disengaged, believers can lead the way in creating cultures of accountability, protection, and genuine care. We can be the ones who use whatever influence we have—large or small—to heal wounds rather than inflict them.
The path forward requires honesty about our own temptations and blind spots. It requires humility to accept correction and wisdom to build safeguards. Most importantly, it requires daily surrender to the One who showed us that true greatness is found in service, and that the greatest power is exercised in self-giving love.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
Faith
Churches Hear Call to Step Into Growing Foster Care Crisis
Faith Facts
- Christian charities Home for Good and Safe Families UK are calling on British churches to address a critical shortage of foster families across the nation.
- The organizations are urging church communities to actively support vulnerable children by becoming foster parents or supporting foster care efforts.
- The initiative highlights the church’s historical role in caring for orphans and vulnerable children as a biblical mandate.
Christian charities across Britain are issuing an urgent call to churches to address a growing crisis in the nation’s foster care system. Home for Good and Safe Families UK are leading the charge, asking congregations to return to the biblical roots of caring for vulnerable children in need of loving homes.
The shortage of foster families has reached critical levels across the United Kingdom, leaving countless children without the stable, nurturing environments they desperately need. These Christian organizations believe the church is uniquely positioned to answer this call, drawing on a rich history of caring for orphans and the marginalized as commanded in Scripture.
“Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction,” James 1:27 reminds believers. This biblical imperative is at the heart of the campaign, which seeks to mobilize Christian families who can offer not just temporary shelter, but genuine love grounded in faith.
Home for Good has been at the forefront of encouraging churches to develop comprehensive fostering and adoption ministries. Their vision extends beyond individual families taking in children to creating entire church communities that rally around foster families with practical support, prayer, and long-term commitment.
Safe Families UK operates on a similar model, providing short-term care for children whose parents are facing temporary crises. This preventative approach keeps families together while ensuring children remain safe during difficult seasons, offering a compassionate alternative that reflects Christian values of both justice and mercy.
The organizations emphasize that churches can contribute in multiple ways beyond direct fostering. Congregations can offer respite care, provide meals, donate supplies, offer transportation, or simply befriend foster families who often feel isolated in their journey. Every act of support strengthens the network of care around vulnerable children.
Britain’s foster care crisis reflects broader cultural shifts away from traditional family structures and community support systems. As government resources stretch thin and fewer families step forward, the need for faith-based solutions grows more urgent. Churches have an opportunity to demonstrate the practical outworking of Christian love in a society hungry for authentic care.
For American Christians watching this development, the parallels are striking. The United States faces similar challenges in its foster care system, with hundreds of thousands of children awaiting permanent homes. The British example offers a model of how churches can mobilize effectively to meet this need, turning faith into action that transforms young lives.
The call goes beyond mere charity—it’s about reclaiming the church’s historic mission to be a family for the fatherless. In an age when institutional trust has eroded and government programs struggle to meet demand, communities of faith possess the relational networks, moral foundations, and long-term commitment necessary to provide genuine stability for children in crisis.
Home for Good and Safe Families UK are not asking churches to shoulder this burden alone, but to partner with existing systems while bringing the unique resources of faith communities: unconditional love, spiritual guidance, and extended family networks that can surround children with support extending far beyond a single household.
As these organizations press forward with their mission, they invite believers to prayerfully consider how God might be calling them to participate in caring for vulnerable children. Whether through direct fostering, adoption, supporting foster families, or advocating for better policies, every Christian has a role to play in ensuring no child faces the world alone.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
Faith
Why the Church Keeps Getting Prophecy Wrong
Faith Facts
- Christian leaders are responding inappropriately to false prophecies, undermining biblical accountability and discernment
- Three common unhelpful reactions include silence, dismissiveness, and deflection when prophecies fail to materialize
- Scripture calls believers to test all prophecies and hold false prophets accountable according to God’s Word
The American church faces a critical moment in how it handles failed prophecies. Too often, well-meaning believers fall into predictable patterns that undermine biblical truth and weaken the body of Christ.
Rather than applying scriptural standards, many Christians default to responses that protect false prophets while leaving congregations vulnerable to deception.
The first unhelpful response is silence. When bold predictions fail to come to pass, those who made them—and those who promoted them—often say nothing. They move on to the next message, the next conference, the next prophetic word, as if accuracy doesn’t matter.
But the Bible holds prophets to a strict standard of truthfulness. Deuteronomy 18:22 makes it clear: if a prophet speaks in the Lord’s name and it doesn’t happen, that word did not come from God.
The second problematic response is dismissiveness—treating failed prophecies as minor mistakes or learning opportunities. This attitude minimizes the seriousness of speaking presumptuously in God’s name.
When leaders claim divine authority for their words, accuracy isn’t optional. God’s reputation is at stake every time someone claims to speak on His behalf.
The third unhelpful pattern is deflection. Some respond to failed prophecies by attacking those who ask for accountability, labeling discernment as divisiveness or legalism. This defensive posture protects the institution rather than the truth.
Jesus warned repeatedly about false prophets. Paul instructed the Thessalonians to test everything and hold fast to what is good. Discernment isn’t unloving—it’s obedient.
American Christians must return to biblical standards for prophecy. This means expecting accuracy, requiring repentance when predictions fail, and prioritizing God’s Word over personal platforms or reputations. The integrity of the church’s witness depends on it.
Faithful believers honor God by upholding truth, even when it’s uncomfortable. The alternative is a church weakened by compromise, where emotional experiences replace biblical authority and feelings trump facts.
Our nation needs a church grounded in Scripture, not swayed by every wind of doctrine or claim of special revelation. Testing prophecies isn’t cynicism—it’s faithfulness to the God who is truth itself.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
-
Self-Reliance1 year agoTrump’s Bold Move Uncovers Massive Social Security Fraud
-
Faith1 year agoNew Clues Emerge in Noah’s Ark Mystery
-
News1 year agoGovernor Walz’s Rhetoric Sparks National Controversy
-
News1 year agoMel Gibson’s ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Sequel Title Announced
-
Family1 year agoTexas Lawmaker Targets Furries in Schools
-
Freedom1 year agoMaine Lawmaker Challenges Sports Fairness Controversy
-
Family12 months agoCanada’s Controversial Policy Sparks Ethical Debate
-
Faith6 months ago
Congress Hears Pleas for Nigerian Christians
