Faith
Korean Scholars Defend Life Against Legal Erosion
Faith Facts
- Korean experts warn legalization of assisted suicide and broader abortion access could erode core bioethical values.
- Seminar speakers stressed that legal proposals mix crucial distinctions between assisted suicide, euthanasia, and death with dignity—posing serious moral and legal risks.
- Medical and ethical concerns highlight that so-called “safe” alternatives often obscure grave dangers for mothers and the unborn.
Korean academics gathered at the Sungsan Bioethics Research Institute’s 28th anniversary seminar to warn that efforts to legalize assisted suicide and expand medication abortion threaten the sanctity of life and ethical foundations.
Participants highlighted that ambiguous laws and weakened safeguards in other countries led to a dangerous expansion of practices once introduced as tightly regulated exceptions.
“‘Death with dignity’ refers to withdrawing life-sustaining treatment at a terminal patient’s request, while assisted suicide involves a person ending their life with help from others, and euthanasia means a third party directly causes death,” Shin Hyo-sung stated.
Law experts noted that Korean legislative proposals rely on after-the-fact review, failing to provide robust protections for the most vulnerable, and risk following the troubling example of the Netherlands, where eligibility for euthanasia has dramatically widened over time.
“The Dutch case is a clear warning that laws introduced with good intentions can expand in unintended directions,” Shin warned.
Medical professionals cautioned against treating medication abortion as a safe shortcut, exposing women to significant and poorly reported health dangers.
“Misoprostol was originally developed to treat gastric ulcers,” Dr. Hong Soon-cheol explained. “Its use as an abortion drug emerged from its side effect of inducing uterine contractions, not from being designed for reproductive care.”
Dr. Hong emphasized that the rise of commercial abortion pills outside of medical supervision has led to complications such as heavy bleeding, uterine rupture, and further surgery—making the procedure hidden but not harmless.
“This is not a safe procedure,” Hong warned. “It is simply a ‘hidden abortion’ — less visible, but not less dangerous.”
Speakers urged policy approaches that defend life and affirm the God-given value of every individual, calling on society not to hide behind rights-based language that ignores genuine long-term health and moral considerations.
“Medication abortion is often described as a ‘safe choice’ or a matter of women’s rights,” Jang Ji-young stated. “But international data show it frequently leads to complications requiring emergency care, hospitalization or surgery.”
Jang further warned that describing abortion access as healthcare actually places greater risk on women and the unborn, contrary to the biblical mandate to cherish life.
“Language such as ‘choice’ and ‘reproductive rights’ can obscure the reality that risk is being transferred to women,” Jang said. “This weakens both women’s health rights and the protection of fetal life.”
Academic respondents noted that all forms of assisted death ethically equate to ending life with medical assistance, regardless of terminology, and that faith-based guidance is crucial as lawmakers debate these profound issues.
“All involve ending life with medical assistance,” Lee Sang-won said.
Nurses called for better end-of-life care education as an alternative to normalized euthanasia, noting the need to strengthen palliative care rooted in compassion and dignity for those near their earthly journey’s end.
“Without proper experience in end-of-life care, medical professionals may see euthanasia as an alternative rather than a last resort,” Choi Ga-eun cautioned.
Organizers encouraged a return to Biblical ethical principles in lawmaking, reminding the public that decisions on life and death speak to the soul of the nation and its commitment to God’s gift of life.
“These are not narrow policy questions,” Hong said. “They are questions about what kind of society we are becoming, and how we define the value of human life.”