Freedom
Colorado Bill Sparks Parental Rights Controversy
In a concerning development for families across Colorado, a new legislative proposal threatens to undermine the fundamental rights of parents to guide their children according to their faith and values. The bill, known as HB1312 or the “Kelly Loving Act,” has already passed the Colorado House of Representatives and is now making its way through the state Senate. This legislation could classify parents as abusive if they do not affirm their child’s gender confusion, potentially leading to the removal of children from their homes.
The bill aims to add “misgendering” and “deadnaming” to the list of discriminatory acts under Colorado’s Anti-Discrimination Act, prohibiting these actions in public spaces. More alarmingly, it mandates that courts consider whether parents are affirming their child’s gender dysphoria in custody disputes. Parents who encourage their children to embrace their God-given gender could face losing custody.
Republican Rep. Jarvis Caldwell has been vocal in his opposition, accusing Democrats of silencing debate by fast-tracking the bill. He expressed concerns that the legislation codifies into law that if parents do not affirm their child’s gender identity, they could be accused of child abuse and risk losing custody.
The repercussions of such legislation are already being felt by parents like Dustin Gonzalez. This Christian father lost custody of his 12-year-old daughter after school officials transitioned her to a different gender identity without his consent. Gonzalez declared, “I’m not just fighting for my daughter. I am fighting to make sure that what happened to me and my family never happens to another parent in this district. The school didn’t inform me, they didn’t ask them, they replaced me.”
Gonzalez’s heartbreaking story is a stark reminder of the dangers posed by this bill. “They didn’t accuse me of abuse, they didn’t claim I caused harm. The only evidence against me was that I said I am not ready to affirm this yet. That’s it,” he shared. “And now I’m at risk of losing parenting time and being erased from my daughter’s life.”
This is not an isolated incident. Across the nation, parents are facing similar battles. In Indiana, Mary and Jeremy Cox lost custody of their child due to their refusal to affirm a gender identity that conflicts with their Biblical beliefs. Mary expressed the pain of having limited access to her children, stating, “I miss his laugh. I miss being with him…we never get that time back.”
Tragically, some stories have ended in irreversible loss. Abigail Martinez, a California mother, lost her daughter to suicide after losing custody because she did not celebrate her child’s gender dysphoria. Martinez testified, “My daughter was murdered by a gender ideology. I lost my daughter over a name and pronouns.”
These stories highlight the urgent need for parents and communities to stand together in defense of parental rights and traditional values. Colorado State Rep. Caldwell is urging citizens to take action before it’s too late. He warned of the bill’s potential to make it impossible for parents to seek help for their gender-confused children by declaring such help as child abuse.
As this bill moves to the Colorado Senate Judiciary Committee, it is crucial for people of faith and conviction to raise their voices. The battle for the soul of our families and the future of our children is at stake. Let us stand firm in our commitment to faith, family, and freedom, ensuring that our God-given rights as parents are upheld.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
Faith Facts
- Scottish families gathered outside Holyrood to oppose legislation threatening educational freedom.
- Proposed amendments may increase regulation for home educators, concerning many Christian families.
- Parents stress the importance of their God-given responsibility in guiding their children’s education.
Men and women of faith in Scotland stood together, voicing concerns over government overreach into family life through proposed education laws. Christian education group Unite for Education organized the rally, emphasizing the need to protect parental authority rooted in biblical principles.
Amendments introduced by Green MSP Ross Greer echo regulations debated at Westminster and would give more power to local authorities, reducing parental control. Families are particularly concerned about the impact on children with special educational needs.
The Labour government has softened some bill requirements, but a Conservative-backed change would allow officials to determine what is in a child’s best interest, a role biblically entrusted to parents. Families of children with disabilities fear negative consequences under this amendment.
“This rally is not the end, it is the beginning of something in Scotland. Parents are not anti‑school. They are concerned. Concerns about what is being taught, rising violence, identity confusion, and the increasing struggles facing young people, including mental health and suicide cannot be ignored. It is time for change, and together we can make that change.”
Unite for Education plans to formally present their concerns to the Scottish government, standing strong for faith, family values, and true freedom.
Stand with Scottish parents and families who value Christian principles by learning more about this important issue.
Faith Facts
- Leading faith groups in Britain have united to voice serious concerns about a proposed official definition of “Islamophobia” by the government.
- The groups argue the change to term “anti-Muslim hostility” could threaten religious equality and restrict free expression.
- Christian, Sikh, Muslim, and Hindu representatives all signed a letter urging the government to abandon its plan.
Faith leaders in the United Kingdom have spoken with one voice in defense of freedom and fairness, questioning a new government proposal concerning the definition of Islamophobia. They warn that privileging one faith over others undermines the balance cherished in a free society.
The proposed shift to “anti-Muslim hostility” prompted concerns that such language could be used to silence legitimate discussion or critique of religious beliefs.
“You have previously said that you will not accept any definition which restricts freedom of expression … However, the definition as it stands threatens to do just that.”
Leaders highlight that vague terms may lead to the suppression of truth and open dialogue—essential pillars for a healthy and just community.
“While the definition would be ‘non-statutory’, it would in practice be widely adopted across the public and private sector. Indeed the definition would appear to be pointless if this were not the case. We urge you to abandon this proposal,” the letter reads.
Christian Concern’s Tim Dieppe warns that singling out Islam for special legal protection may itself breach equality laws and discriminate against other faith communities.
“What the proposed definition of anti-Muslim hostility does is it goes beyond the law in giving Islam and Muslims special protection. In doing so it could constitute ‘unlawful discrimination towards members of other faith groups.’”
Evangelical leader David Robertson added a warning that preaching Christ and biblical truth must never be mislabeled as hatred.
“I can see a day coming in the not-too-distant future when … writers like me will be prosecuted under the Islamophobia blasphemy law for spreading hate against Muslims. But preaching Christ and his word is not hatred, nor is it any kind of phobia. It is Christian love,” he said.
Biblical foundations call us to stand boldly for the right to speak truth in love—defending freedom and honoring God’s design for justice and equality in society.
Faith Facts
- The government has removed some controversial home education measures from the proposed Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, but significant concerns remain.
- A new amendment allows local authorities, not parents, to determine the ‘best interests’ of a ‘child in need.’
- Planned pilot schemes may leave home-educating parents vulnerable to legal penalties before meetings with officials occur.
Recent changes to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill have eased some burdens on Christian families, though challenges to parental authority persist. The original proposal demanded detailed registers from home educators, which many believed threatened both liberty and privacy.
The Christian Institute has noted that, despite positive steps, dangers remain if officials can override a parent’s wisdom in caring for their children. Securing Christian freedom in education is vital to a nation built on faith and strong families.
“The law must respect the principle that ordinarily, it is for parents to make decisions about children. We can pray that the Government will be able to remove this overbroad amendment from the Bill before it becomes law.”
Keeping parental rights central to law affirms Biblical teachings that parents are entrusted by God to nurture and instruct their children. Defending these values means holding leaders accountable and praying for wise decision-making.
Remain vigilant for further developments so we may stand together for faith, family values, and freedom under God.
-
Self-Reliance10 months agoTrump’s Bold Move Uncovers Massive Social Security Fraud
-
News11 months agoGovernor Walz’s Rhetoric Sparks National Controversy
-
Faith10 months agoNew Clues Emerge in Noah’s Ark Mystery
-
Family11 months agoTexas Lawmaker Targets Furries in Schools
-
News10 months agoMel Gibson’s ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Sequel Title Announced
-
Freedom11 months agoMaine Lawmaker Challenges Sports Fairness Controversy
-
Family9 months agoCanada’s Controversial Policy Sparks Ethical Debate
-
Faith3 months ago
Congress Hears Pleas for Nigerian Christians