Connect with us

Freedom

When Federal Law Only Protects One Side

Published

on

Faith Facts

  • The FACE Act was signed into law in 1994 to protect both abortion facilities and pro-life pregnancy centers from violence and intimidation
  • Since 2022, over 400 attacks on pro-life pregnancy centers and churches have been documented, yet few prosecutions have occurred under the FACE Act
  • Meanwhile, pro-life activists have faced aggressive federal prosecution under the same statute, raising questions about equal application of justice

A federal law meant to protect everyone appears to be enforcing justice selectively. The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act was designed to shield both abortion facilities and pro-life pregnancy centers from violence and obstruction. Yet its application tells a troubling story about unequal treatment under the law.

Since its passage in 1994, the FACE Act promised equal protection for all facilities providing reproductive health services. That commitment now rings hollow for many Americans of faith who have watched their churches and crisis pregnancy centers targeted with minimal federal response.

The statistics reveal a troubling pattern. Beginning in 2022, following the Dobbs decision that returned abortion policy to the states, pro-life pregnancy centers and churches experienced a dramatic surge in attacks. Vandalism, arson, and intimidation became routine occurrences across the nation.

More than 400 documented incidents targeted pro-life facilities and houses of worship. Windows were shattered, threatening messages spray-painted on walls, and fire damage inflicted on buildings serving vulnerable women. Yet federal prosecutions under the FACE Act for these crimes remain remarkably rare.

The contrast with enforcement against pro-life activists could not be starker. Federal authorities have pursued FACE Act charges aggressively against those accused of blocking access to abortion facilities, even in cases involving peaceful protest. Some defendants have faced years in federal prison for non-violent civil disobedience.

This disparity raises fundamental questions about justice in America. When federal law enforcement agencies choose which victims deserve protection and which perpetrators merit prosecution, the rule of law itself suffers. Equal protection under the law is not a suggestion—it is a constitutional guarantee.

For Christian Americans who operate pregnancy centers, the message seems clear: your safety matters less. These centers provide free ultrasounds, material support, and counseling to women facing unexpected pregnancies. They serve their communities without government funding, motivated by faith and compassion. Yet when extremists target them with violence, the federal response has been largely silent.

The broken promise of the FACE Act extends beyond statistics. It touches the lives of volunteers who now serve with heightened security concerns, donors who watch their charitable investments literally go up in smoke, and women in crisis who lose access to services because centers cannot afford to rebuild.

Churches have not been spared either. Houses of worship have been vandalized with threatening slogans, their sanctuaries defaced, their congregations intimidated. These are not merely property crimes—they are attacks on religious freedom itself. Yet prosecutions remain scarce.

The path forward requires courage from federal law enforcement. Equal access to reproductive health services, as the FACE Act promises, cannot exist without equal protection for all facilities providing those services. Selective enforcement undermines both justice and public trust.

Congress may need to examine whether the FACE Act requires clarification or whether the problem lies purely in its application. Americans of all perspectives should agree that violence and intimidation have no place in our public discourse, regardless of the target.

Until federal authorities demonstrate genuine commitment to protecting all facilities equally, the FACE Act’s promise remains broken. True justice demands that those who firebomb a pregnancy center face the same federal scrutiny as those who block an abortion clinic’s entrance. Anything less betrays the fundamental American principle of equal justice under law.

The crisis pregnancy centers and churches that have been attacked are not asking for special treatment. They are simply asking for the protection that federal law already promises them. That should not be controversial—it should be guaranteed.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Freedom

Global Leaders Gather in London With Urgent Mission to Save Western Civilization

Published

on

Faith Facts

  • Thousands of international leaders and thinkers convened in London this week to address what they identify as existential threats to Western civilization and traditional values
  • The gathering reflects growing concern among Christians and conservatives about cultural decline and the systematic deconstruction of foundational principles
  • Participants are united in their commitment to reversing course and rebuilding society on time-tested Judeo-Christian foundations

An unprecedented gathering is taking place in London this week as thousands converge from across the globe with a shared mission. These leaders, thinkers, and concerned citizens recognize that Western civilization faces threats unlike any in recent memory—and they’re determined to act.

The assembly reflects a growing awareness among people of faith and traditional values that the very foundations of our society are under assault. From family structures to religious freedom, from educational integrity to national sovereignty, the pillars that have sustained Western prosperity and liberty for centuries are being systematically dismantled.

What makes this gathering significant is not just the diagnosis of decline, but the unified commitment to reconstruction. Attendees aren’t simply lamenting what’s been lost—they’re strategizing about how to rebuild on principles that have proven their worth across generations.

The sense of urgency is palpable. Many participants recognize that the window for peaceful, democratic restoration may be closing. The cultural revolution that has swept through institutions—from universities to corporations to government agencies—has accelerated at an alarming pace, leaving many Americans feeling like strangers in their own country.

Yet amid the concern, there’s also hope. The very fact that thousands are willing to travel internationally to address these challenges demonstrates that the spirit of the West—rooted in faith, reason, and liberty—is far from extinguished.

This movement represents more than political activism. It’s a spiritual and cultural awakening among those who understand that civilization isn’t self-sustaining. Each generation must choose whether to preserve, improve, and pass along the inheritance they’ve received—or allow it to crumble through neglect or active destruction.

The stakes couldn’t be higher. Western civilization, built on Judeo-Christian values and classical liberal principles, has produced unprecedented human flourishing. Religious freedom, rule of law, scientific advancement, and individual dignity—these aren’t accidents of history but fruits of a worldview that recognizes human beings as created in God’s image.

The question now is whether this generation will rise to defend and restore what previous generations built and preserved at great cost. The gathering in London suggests that many are ready for that challenge.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Continue Reading

Freedom

Nations Unite Behind Bold Declaration on Surrogacy and Human Dignity

Published

on

Faith Facts

  • A coalition of governments launched a political declaration at the United Nations calling for an international moratorium on surrogacy
  • The declaration frames surrogacy as incompatible with human rights protections for women and children
  • The initiative represents a significant international effort to protect the dignity of women and children from commodification

In a significant development at the United Nations, a coalition of governments has formally launched a political declaration calling for a global moratorium on surrogacy. The declaration, presented on June 22, takes a firm stance on the practice, framing it as fundamentally incompatible with human rights protections for women and children.

This bold initiative represents a growing international recognition of the ethical concerns surrounding surrogacy arrangements. The declaration highlights how these practices can reduce women and children to commodities in commercial transactions, raising serious moral and human dignity questions.

The coalition’s action at the UN marks a pivotal moment in the global conversation about the intersection of reproductive technology, women’s rights, and children’s welfare. By calling for an international moratorium, these nations are asserting that certain practices, regardless of technological capability, must be evaluated through the lens of human dignity and protection of the vulnerable.

The declaration comes at a time when surrogacy arrangements have become increasingly commercialized in various parts of the world. Advocates for the moratorium argue that such arrangements often exploit economically vulnerable women and treat children as products to be bought and sold, rather than as human beings created in the image of God with inherent dignity and worth.

This international effort reflects traditional values that prioritize the protection of women and children from exploitation. The coalition’s stand at the United Nations demonstrates a willingness to challenge modern practices that may violate fundamental principles of human dignity, even when those practices are technologically possible and legally permitted in some jurisdictions.

The declaration’s emphasis on human rights protections aligns with a Christian worldview that sees every person as possessing intrinsic value. By framing surrogacy as incompatible with these protections, the coalition is making a moral statement about the limits that should be placed on reproductive technologies and commercial arrangements involving human life.

As this declaration moves forward in the international arena, it will likely spark important conversations about the proper boundaries of reproductive technology and the responsibilities nations have to protect their most vulnerable citizens. The coalition’s action represents a courageous stand for human dignity in an age where technological advancement often outpaces ethical consideration.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Continue Reading

Freedom

When Patriotism Means Speaking Hard Truths About Global Threats

Published

on

Faith Facts

  • Christian values call for truth-telling even when it challenges popular narratives among fellow conservatives
  • True love for any nation means desiring its repentance and turning from aggression, not enabling its destructive path
  • Biblical principles of justice and defending the innocent apply universally, not selectively based on political alignments

The current geopolitical climate has created unexpected divisions within conservative circles, particularly regarding America’s approach to international conflicts. While unity on core principles remains vital, honest disagreement on foreign policy matters reflects the robust debate our Founders intended.

One prominent conservative voice has taken positions on Russia that deserve careful examination through the lens of Christian principles and American interests. When we truly care about any nation’s welfare, we seek its redemption, not the continuation of policies that harm both its own citizens and innocent neighbors.

The Christian worldview compels us to distinguish between loving a people and endorsing their government’s actions. Throughout Scripture, prophets called nations to account precisely because they cared about those nations’ ultimate good. Enabling destructive behavior is not compassion—it’s complicity.

Praying for Russia’s defeat in its current aggressive posture is not hatred of the Russian people. Rather, it reflects a desire to see an end to policies causing tremendous suffering. History shows that military defeats have sometimes been the catalyst for nations to change course and embrace better paths forward.

American conservatives should not adopt reflexive positions on international matters based solely on opposition to domestic political opponents. Our foreign policy positions must be rooted in unchanging principles: defending innocent life, opposing aggression, and supporting freedom. These values don’t shift based on who occupies the White House or which media figures promote certain narratives.

The Reagan tradition of conservative foreign policy recognized that American strength and moral clarity served both our interests and global stability. Speaking hard truths about threats to freedom—wherever they arise—honors that legacy far more than selective application of principles based on current political fashions.

True patriotism sometimes requires Christians to stand apart from popular opinion, even within their own political circles. Our ultimate allegiance is to truth and righteousness, not to maintaining comfortable alliances or avoiding difficult conversations with those who typically share our values.

When we pray for nations, we pray for their people to be free, their leaders to embrace justice, and their policies to reflect God’s design for human flourishing. Sometimes those prayers require us to hope for outcomes that challenge entrenched power structures that perpetuate suffering.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Continue Reading

Trending