Faith Facts

• Trey Falwell has filed a $1.75 million lawsuit against Liberty University alleging breach of contract
• The university was founded by his grandfather, the late Rev. Jerry Falwell, a prominent evangelical leader
• The legal dispute marks another chapter in the ongoing tensions between the Falwell family and the Virginia-based Christian institution

The grandson of evangelical icon Rev. Jerry Falwell has taken legal action against the university his grandfather founded more than five decades ago. Trey Falwell filed a $1.75 million lawsuit against Liberty University, alleging the Virginia-based Christian institution breached its contractual obligations to him.

The lawsuit represents the latest development in a complicated relationship between the Falwell family and Liberty University. The institution, which stands as one of the nation’s largest Christian universities, has become a symbol of evangelical higher education and traditional values in American culture.

Rev. Jerry Falwell founded Liberty University with a vision to train champions for Christ who would impact the culture. His legacy continues to shape evangelical education and conservative Christian activism across America. The university has grown significantly since its founding, educating tens of thousands of students in biblical principles and traditional values.

Details of the specific contractual claims have not been fully disclosed publicly. The substantial damages sought in the lawsuit suggest significant financial stakes in the dispute between Trey Falwell and the university administration.

This legal action comes at a time when many Christian institutions face challenges balancing family legacy, institutional independence, and faithful adherence to their founding missions. The outcome of this case may have implications for how faith-based institutions navigate relationships with founding families.

Liberty University continues to operate as a major force in Christian higher education, maintaining its commitment to biblical truth and conservative values. The institution serves students from across the nation who seek an education grounded in Christian worldview and principles.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Faith Facts

• Elevation College will charge up to $20,000 annually for ministry-related degrees starting fall 2025
• The program is offered through the 10,000-member Elevation Church based in Charlotte, North Carolina
• Only limited spots are available on the megachurch’s campuses for enrolled students

A new Christian higher education initiative is generating discussion as Elevation Church prepares to welcome its first class of college students this fall. The Charlotte-based megachurch announced that tuition and housing costs for its newly launched Elevation College will reach up to $20,000 per year.

The program represents a significant investment for families seeking ministry training within the megachurch environment. Students will pursue various ministry-related degree programs while living and learning on Elevation Church campuses.

The announcement comes as Christian families continue searching for faith-based alternatives to secular higher education. With limited enrollment capacity, the college will serve a select number of students in its inaugural year.

The tuition structure places Elevation College in the mid-range pricing tier compared to traditional Christian colleges and universities across the country. Housing costs are included in the annual figure, making the total investment more comprehensive than tuition-only programs.

Elevation Church, known for its contemporary worship style and multi-site model, is expanding its influence into Christian education with this new venture. The 10,000-member congregation provides the institutional foundation and resources for the academic program.

Ministry-focused curriculum will prepare students for various roles in church leadership and Christian service. The campus-based model offers an immersive experience unlike online or commuter-only programs.

Questions remain about accreditation, degree recognition, and how graduates will transition into ministry positions after completion. The limited availability of on-campus spots suggests high demand or capacity constraints in the program’s early stages.

Christian higher education continues evolving as churches and ministries develop new models for training the next generation of leaders. Elevation College represents one approach to keeping young believers engaged in faith-based learning environments.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Faith Facts

• Iran continues to advance its nuclear program while international oversight weakens, raising urgent questions about global security and Middle East stability.
• Israel faces an existential threat from a nuclear-capable Iran, with profound implications for the safety of the Jewish state and American interests in the region.
• The failure to prevent Iran from reaching nuclear threshold status represents a critical test of Western resolve and the protection of our closest allies.

A pressing question confronts America, Israel, and freedom-loving nations worldwide: Can we accept an Iran perched perpetually on the edge of nuclear weapons capability?

The Islamic Republic has spent decades advancing its nuclear program despite international sanctions, diplomatic pressure, and economic isolation. Now, as Tehran edges closer to weapons-grade uranium enrichment, the world must confront an uncomfortable reality about the cost of inaction.

For Israel, the stakes could not be higher. A nuclear-armed Iran represents an existential threat to the Jewish state, whose right to exist Iranian leaders have repeatedly denied. The regime in Tehran has funded terrorist proxies throughout the Middle East, from Hezbollah in Lebanon to Hamas in Gaza, all while chanting “Death to America” and “Death to Israel” in its legislative chambers.

American security interests are equally at risk. Iran’s nuclear ambitions destabilize an already volatile region where U.S. forces maintain a presence and where critical energy resources flow to global markets. A nuclear Iran would embolden the regime’s aggression, potentially triggering a regional arms race as Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Turkey consider their own nuclear options.

The question of whether the world can “live with” a nuclear-threshold Iran assumes that containment and deterrence strategies proven during the Cold War will work against a theocratic regime driven by apocalyptic ideology. This assumption may prove dangerously naive.

Unlike the Soviet Union, which operated under rational self-interest, Iran’s leadership has demonstrated a willingness to sacrifice its own people for ideological goals. The regime’s support for terrorism, its violent suppression of domestic protesters, and its stated commitment to exporting its revolution suggest a different calculation of risk and reward.

For years, diplomatic efforts have failed to curtail Iran’s nuclear ambitions meaningfully. The 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, celebrated by its architects as a diplomatic breakthrough, merely delayed Iran’s path to nuclear weapons while releasing billions in sanctions relief that funded regional terror operations. The agreement’s sunset clauses guaranteed that restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program would eventually expire, leaving the regime free to pursue weapons development legally under the deal’s own terms.

Israel has made clear it will not permit Iran to obtain nuclear weapons, regardless of international opinion. The Jewish state has twice bombed nuclear facilities in hostile nations—Iraq in 1981 and Syria in 2007—demonstrating its willingness to act unilaterally when its survival is threatened.

The question facing policymakers is not whether a nuclear Iran poses unacceptable risks, but whether those risks will be confronted now through preventive measures or later under far more dangerous circumstances. Every month of delay sees Iran’s nuclear knowledge deepen, its stockpiles grow, and its defensive capabilities strengthen.

Christians have a particular interest in this question, both for the safety of persecuted believers within Iran and for the security of Israel, a nation of profound biblical significance. The Iranian regime ranks among the world’s worst persecutors of Christians, imprisoning and executing believers for their faith.

The failure of Western powers to prevent North Korea from developing nuclear weapons offers a sobering precedent. Diplomacy, sanctions, and international pressure all failed to stop Pyongyang’s program. Today, the hermit kingdom holds the world hostage with its nuclear arsenal, launching missiles over Japan and threatening American cities.

America and its allies must decide whether to accept this outcome repeating in the Middle East, with consequences far more severe given Iran’s central role in funding global terrorism and its stated hostility toward Israel’s existence. The answer to whether we can live with a nuclear Iran may ultimately be determined not by our choices, but by our willingness to prevent that scenario from becoming reality.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.