Faith Facts

• The U.S. Department of Education officially defended homeschooling families after liberal podcasters attacked the practice as a “crazy Christian problem”
• Podcasters used profane language to disparage homeschooling, claiming it leads to “trickle-down stupidity”
• The federal response marks a significant shift toward recognizing and protecting parental rights in education

The U.S. Department of Education issued a strong defense of homeschooling families Wednesday, responding to inflammatory comments made by liberal podcasters who launched a profanity-laced attack on Christian homeschoolers. The podcasters characterized homeschooling as “weird” and specifically targeted Christian families who choose to educate their children at home.

The hostile remarks went beyond simple criticism, with the commentators using crude language to mock millions of American families exercising their constitutional right to direct their children’s education. They framed homeschooling as a “crazy Christian problem” and made unsubstantiated claims about educational outcomes.

I’m offering Jennifer Welch and Angie Sullivan of the I’ve Had It Podcast an opportunity to prove themselves right. They said that homeschooling is for “dumb people” who, for some reason, want to be around their kids.

So, LET’S PUT IT TO THE TEST. If homeschoolers are taught by… pic.twitter.com/wsRqu10NRU

— Glenn Beck (@glennbeck) July 15, 2026

The Department of Education’s response represents a departure from previous administrations that often viewed homeschooling families with skepticism or outright hostility. By publicly defending these families, the department is affirming the fundamental right of parents to make educational decisions for their children without facing public ridicule or government interference.

Homeschooling has grown exponentially in recent years, with families from diverse backgrounds choosing to educate their children outside traditional public school systems. Many cite concerns about curriculum content, safety, educational quality, and the desire to incorporate faith-based instruction as primary motivations for their decision.

Research has consistently shown that homeschooled students often outperform their public school peers on standardized tests and demonstrate strong social development. The attacks on homeschooling families appear rooted more in ideological opposition to parental authority and religious freedom than in legitimate educational concerns.

The podcasters’ comments reveal a deeper cultural divide over who has primary authority over children’s education and values formation. For many Christians and conservatives, the right to homeschool represents a crucial safeguard against government overreach and secular indoctrination in public schools.

The federal government’s willingness to publicly defend homeschooling families signals an important recognition that parents, not bureaucrats or media personalities, should determine how their children are educated. This affirmation of parental rights comes at a critical time when families face increasing pressure to conform to progressive educational standards that often conflict with traditional Christian values.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Faith Facts

• Multiple cases have emerged of men using mail-ordered abortion pills to poison women without their knowledge or consent
• The FDA’s 2021 decision to allow mail-order abortion pills has made these dangerous drugs easier to obtain for criminal purposes
• Pro-life advocates are calling on the Department of Justice to address this growing pattern of violence against women

A disturbing pattern of violence against women is emerging across America, and it involves a tool the FDA made easier to access: abortion pills. Men are obtaining these dangerous drugs through the mail and using them to poison unsuspecting women, sometimes killing both the woman and her unborn child.

These are not isolated incidents. They represent a predictable consequence of policies that prioritize abortion access over women’s safety.

In multiple states, prosecutors have charged men with using mifepristone and misoprostol—the two-drug abortion pill regimen—to secretly induce miscarriages in women who wanted to keep their babies. Some cases have resulted in the deaths of both mother and child. Yet the Department of Justice has remained largely silent on this pattern of violence.

The FDA’s 2021 decision to permanently allow mail-order abortion pills, followed by the 2023 decision to allow retail pharmacies to dispense them, has made these drugs far more accessible. While abortion advocates celebrated these moves as expanding “reproductive freedom,” they ignored warnings about potential abuse.

Traditional safeguards existed for good reasons. When abortion pills required in-person doctor visits, there were more opportunities to ensure the woman herself was making the choice. The mail-order system eliminates those protections entirely.

Pro-life organizations have repeatedly warned federal authorities about this danger. They have documented cases where abusive partners, controlling family members, or even traffickers could use mail-ordered pills to force abortions on unwilling victims. The evidence continues to mount.

This crisis exposes the fatal flaw in the “telemedicine abortion” model. When pills can be ordered online with minimal verification and shipped to any address, there is no way to ensure they reach the intended recipient—or that the recipient is acting of her own free will.

Women deserve better than policies that make them vulnerable to violence. The unborn children whose lives are ended by these forced abortions deserve justice. And the men who commit these heinous acts deserve prosecution to the fullest extent of the law.

The Department of Justice has vast resources to combat violence against women. It has launched major initiatives on domestic violence, human trafficking, and reproductive coercion. Yet this specific pattern of abuse—men using mail-ordered abortion pills as weapons—has received minimal federal attention.

Congress must demand answers. Why has the DOJ not made this a priority? How many cases have been investigated? What coordination exists between federal prosecutors and state authorities handling these crimes?

The silence is deafening, and it endangers women across the country.

This issue transcends the usual abortion debate. Even those who support legal abortion should oppose policies that enable violent men to force unwanted abortions on women. This is not about choice—it is about coercion, assault, and sometimes murder.

The FDA must reconsider its mail-order abortion policy. At minimum, stronger verification procedures are needed to confirm the identity and consent of the woman requesting the pills. Better yet, the agency should return to requiring in-person medical supervision for these powerful and dangerous drugs.

The Department of Justice must launch a comprehensive investigation into this pattern of violence and develop a coordinated federal response. Women’s lives depend on it.

Policies have consequences. When government agencies prioritize ideological goals over safety, real people suffer. The victims in these cases—women who wanted their babies, children who never got the chance to be born—are paying the price for regulatory negligence.

Americans who value both life and women’s safety must speak out. Contact your representatives in Congress. Demand DOJ action. Support organizations working to expose these crimes and assist victims.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Faith Facts

• A 28-year-old U.S. Navy veteran regained consciousness after doctors declared him brain-dead and his family prepared for organ donation
• The family spent days planning his funeral before the miraculous recovery occurred
• Medical professionals had diagnosed severe brain damage with no expectation of survival

A young Navy veteran’s family was preparing to say their final goodbyes when God had other plans. The 28-year-old service member, declared brain-dead by medical professionals, awakened just as his loved ones had completed funeral arrangements and agreed to donate his organs.

Doctors had delivered the devastating news that severe brain damage left no hope for recovery. The family, grappling with unimaginable grief, began the painful process of planning a funeral for their son and brother who had served his country with honor.

In what can only be described as divine intervention, the veteran defied every medical prediction and regained consciousness. His family members have been vocal in attributing the recovery to the power of prayer and God’s mercy, calling it nothing short of a miracle.

The case highlights the mysterious nature of brain injury prognosis and the importance of faith during life’s darkest moments. For this military family, their prayers were answered in the most dramatic way possible, transforming what would have been a tragedy into a testimony of hope.

Stories like these remind us that modern medicine, while advanced, cannot fully explain the workings of life and consciousness. They also underscore the value of every human life and the importance of never giving up hope, even when circumstances appear hopeless.

The veteran’s recovery serves as an encouragement to families facing similar medical crises across the nation. While medical professionals provide their best assessments based on science and experience, ultimately life and death remain in God’s hands.

This miraculous awakening raises important questions about organ donation protocols and the need for absolute certainty before such irreversible decisions are made. The family’s faith sustained them through the darkest hours and was ultimately rewarded.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.