Faith Facts

• Texas State Board of Education adopted a new social studies curriculum highlighting radical Islam’s role in the 9/11 terror attacks
• The curriculum includes historical facts about Mohammed’s military campaigns against Jewish and Christian tribes
• Christianity’s foundational role in shaping American government and world history will be properly taught to Texas students

The Texas State Board of Education has taken a bold step toward historical accuracy and truth in education. In a significant curriculum update, the board has approved a revised social studies framework that will ensure students learn the complete story of the September 11, 2001 terror attacks—including the role that radical Islam played in that devastating day.

This curriculum change represents a victory for parents and educators who have long advocated for honest, fact-based instruction about world events and America’s Christian foundations. For too long, political correctness has sanitized textbooks and classroom materials, leaving students with an incomplete understanding of both threats to our nation and the values that built it.

The new Texas standards will teach students about Mohammed’s historical military campaigns against Jewish and Christian communities. This historically accurate information provides crucial context for understanding religious conflicts throughout history and into the present day.

Equally important, the curriculum emphasizes Christianity’s central role in the formation of American government and the development of Western civilization. Our Founding Fathers drew heavily upon biblical principles and Christian philosophy when crafting our Constitution and establishing our republic.

This approach to education honors truth over ideology. It equips young Texans with the knowledge they need to understand the world as it actually is, not as progressive activists wish it to be.

By teaching about radical Islam’s connection to terrorism, Texas is ensuring that the next generation will not forget the lessons of 9/11. By highlighting Christianity’s contributions to civilization, the state is preserving an accurate understanding of our national heritage and the faith that has guided America since its founding.

Texas continues to lead the nation in standing firm for traditional values and educational excellence. This curriculum update demonstrates that it’s possible to teach history honestly while respecting all students—truth is not bigotry, and facts are not hate speech.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Faith Facts

• Lindsay Clancy’s attorney is requesting a presidential pardon after a mistrial in her triple murder case involving her three children
• Defense claims postpartum depression caused the deaths, while prosecutors maintain the killings were premeditated
• The case raises profound questions about personal responsibility, mental health, and justice for innocent victims

The attorney representing Lindsay Clancy, the Massachusetts mother accused of killing her three young children, has made an unprecedented appeal to President Donald Trump for a pardon following a mistrial in her case. The lawyer continues to assert that his client’s actions were the result of postpartum depression rather than intentional wrongdoing.

Clancy gained national attention after the tragic deaths of her children shocked the nation. Her defense team has consistently argued that severe postpartum mental health issues led to the tragedy, seeking to frame the incident as a medical crisis rather than a criminal act.

The mistrial represents a significant development in a case that has divided public opinion between those emphasizing mental health compassion and those demanding accountability for the loss of innocent lives. Prosecutors have maintained throughout proceedings that evidence points to premeditation, challenging the defense’s characterization of the events.

For families of faith, the case presents deeply troubling questions about justice, mercy, and the protection of the most vulnerable among us. While Christians are called to show compassion for those suffering from mental illness, the deliberate taking of innocent life—especially that of children—represents a fundamental violation of God’s commandment and the sacred duty parents bear toward their offspring.

The request for a presidential pardon in an ongoing state criminal case is highly unusual and raises constitutional questions. Presidential pardons typically apply only to federal crimes, not state-level offenses, making the legal basis for such clemency uncertain at best.

Legal experts note that even if the president possessed such authority, pardoning someone accused of killing three children would face enormous public scrutiny. The role of mental health in criminal culpability remains a complex area of law, but courts have long held that individuals must still be held accountable for their actions, particularly when vulnerable victims are involved.

Conservative advocates for victims’ rights have expressed concern that the pardon request represents an attempt to circumvent the justice system. They argue that regardless of mental health challenges, society must maintain clear standards of accountability when innocent children lose their lives.

The case continues to generate discussion about how the legal system should balance mental health considerations with the demands of justice. As the proceedings move forward, the fate of Lindsay Clancy will ultimately rest with the courts rather than executive clemency.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Faith Facts

• Virginia Theological Seminary commissioned a sculpture celebrating Bishop Mariann Budde’s 2020 confrontation with President Donald Trump
• The bishop has been criticized by Christian conservatives for prioritizing progressive politics over biblical teaching
• The seminary’s decision reflects a broader divide within mainline Protestant denominations over faith and political engagement

Virginia Theological Seminary has unveiled a new sculpture honoring Episcopal Church Bishop Mariann Budde for her public rebuke of President Donald Trump in 2020. The installation has sparked conversation about the role of religious institutions in partisan political discourse.

The sculpture celebrates Budde’s controversial sermon delivered at Washington National Cathedral, where she openly criticized the president during a service he attended following civil unrest in the nation’s capital. Her remarks drew sharp criticism from conservatives who viewed them as inappropriate for a worship setting.

Christian conservatives have long expressed concern about the Episcopal Church’s drift from traditional biblical teaching toward progressive social activism. The decision to memorialize a partisan political moment with permanent artwork raises questions about the seminary’s priorities and mission.

Virginia Theological Seminary trains future Episcopal clergy and has increasingly embraced progressive theological positions in recent decades. The installation of this sculpture appears to signal the institution’s commitment to a social justice-oriented vision of Christianity.

Critics argue that commemorating political confrontation rather than faithful gospel ministry reveals a troubling departure from the seminary’s foundational purpose. They note that Jesus himself refused to be drawn into the political conflicts of his day, choosing instead to focus on spiritual transformation.

The Episcopal Church has experienced significant membership decline in recent years, losing hundreds of thousands of members as it has moved further from biblical orthodoxy. Many traditionalist congregations have left the denomination over issues including the authority of Scripture and human sexuality.

Supporters of Bishop Budde view her rebuke as an act of prophetic courage, speaking truth to power in a moment of national crisis. They contend that faith leaders have a responsibility to address injustice and hold political leaders accountable.

The sculpture serves as a lasting reminder of the deep divisions within American Christianity over the proper relationship between faith and politics. While some believers see political activism as essential to Christian witness, others maintain that the church’s primary calling is proclaiming the gospel and making disciples.

The debate reflects broader questions about whether religious institutions should prioritize temporal political goals or eternal spiritual concerns. These tensions are unlikely to be resolved soon as both sides claim the moral high ground.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.