Connect with us

News

Celebrity Priest Calvin Robinson Dismissed for Controversial Behavior and Statements

Published

on

archbishop

Archbishop Mark Haverland took decisive action against British priest Calvin Robinson by terminating his ministerial license following a series of controversial incidents and statements, including an inappropriate gesture at a pro-life rally in Washington, D.C. Robinson, a figure popular in conservative political circles, had reportedly mimicked a “Nazi salute,” escalating concerns about his conduct and rhetoric, which the Archbishop deemed increasingly problematic.

The issues surrounding Robinson began surfacing publicly when he denied receiving any formal communication from his church leaders. However, Archbishop Haverland provided evidence to the contrary, highlighting multiple instances where Robinson was cautioned about his behavior and public statements. The Anglican Ink website detailed these communications, underscoring the church’s growing unease with Robinson’s public persona and engagements.

Robinson’s contentious remarks began with a post criticizing the Talmud, describing it as “uniquely hostile toward Jesus Christ,” and escalated to include public discussions where he entertained and seemingly endorsed antisemitic viewpoints. This included a notable episode on his show “Bros with Fros,” where guest Joel Webbon made extreme comments about Judaism, which Robinson did not challenge.

The Archbishop’s statement clarified that the decision to revoke Robinson’s license was not solely based on the salute at the National Pro-Life Summit but was a culmination of his continued engagement in what was described as “antisemitic trolling.” Haverland expressed deep concern over Robinson’s judgment and the potential harm his actions could bring to the church’s reputation and mission.

Furthermore, Robinson’s subsequent public statements and actions have continued to stir controversy. Following his dismissal, he traveled to Israel and critiqued evangelical support for the country, suggesting that it represented a misplaced veneration that could be seen as idolatrous. He also openly criticized the term “Judeo-Christian,” aligning himself with figures like Candace Owens, known for her provocative statements regarding Jewish influence and the Holocaust.

The situation has prompted significant media coverage and public discourse, highlighting the complex interplay between religious belief, political ideology, and public behavior. As Robinson faces widespread criticism and potential isolation from various religious communities, his case serves as a cautionary tale about the responsibilities and consequences that public figures face, especially when their actions clash with the values of their institutions and communities.

In light of these events, the church is calling on its members and leaders to reflect on the importance of maintaining a respectful and inclusive dialogue, particularly on sensitive historical and theological issues. The broader Christian community is also urged to consider the impact of their public statements and actions, ensuring they align with Christ-like compassion and understanding, avoiding divisive rhetoric and behavior.

Source

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Republicans Propose Tax on International Money Transfers

Published

on

In a bold move to safeguard American interests and uphold the principles of national sovereignty, Republican lawmakers are considering a strategic initiative to tax the billions of dollars sent abroad annually as remittances. This proposal aligns seamlessly with the values of faith, family, and freedom that are cherished by many Americans, particularly those who hold conservative views.

Every year, vast sums of money are sent from the United States to other countries by workers residing within our borders, both legally and illegally. These remittances significantly bolster the economies of countries like Mexico and those in Northern Central America. For instance, the World Bank reports that remittances constitute about 17% of the GDP in Northern Central America and 4.5% of Mexico’s GDP.

However, this financial outflow has sparked a necessary debate about the impact on the American economy and national security. The Republican proposal aims to impose a 5% tax on funds sent abroad by non-citizens or foreign nationals. This measure is projected to generate over $22 billion in revenue over a decade, funds that could be pivotal in extending the tax cuts that have already benefited countless American families.

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has criticized the proposal, labeling it as “arbitrary and unjust.” Yet, from a conservative perspective, this initiative is far from unjust. It represents a fair and strategic approach to ensuring that those who benefit from the American economy also contribute to its sustainability and security.

Rep. Kevin Hern of Oklahoma encapsulated the dual benefits of this proposal, stating, “It’s a two-fold win: taxing remittances will help slow down the cash flow to cartels and will also create a new revenue source we can use to build the wall and secure our border.” This approach not only addresses economic concerns but also tackles the pressing issues of drug trafficking and illegal immigration, which threaten the safety and stability of American families.

The surge in remittances to countries like Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras, with increases of up to 20% recently, underscores the urgency of this measure. By reducing the financial “pull” factor that attracts illegal immigration, this tax plan serves as a robust tool in preserving the integrity of our borders.

In essence, this proposal is a testament to the commitment of Republican leaders to prioritize the well-being of American citizens. It reflects a deep understanding of the need for individual responsibility and the importance of biblical principles in shaping a society that values hard work, fairness, and national pride. By supporting this initiative, we take a stand for a future where faith, family, and freedom are protected and celebrated.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

News

Trump’s Bold Plan for a New Missile Defense

Published

on

In a bold move to fortify America’s defenses, President Donald Trump has championed the creation of a “Golden Dome” missile defense system, inspired by Israel’s successful Iron Dome. This initiative underscores the administration’s unwavering commitment to protecting American citizens in an increasingly perilous world. As President Trump declared, “This is a very dangerous world. We’re going to protect our citizens like never before.”

The vision for the Golden Dome is ambitious, aiming to shield the nation from a spectrum of threats, including ballistic missiles, hypersonic weapons, and drone swarms. By signing an executive order in January 2025, President Trump has tasked the Department of Defense with the crucial mission of developing and deploying this advanced missile defense shield.

This project has garnered significant support from defense contractors, notably Lockheed Martin, which has already showcased a promotional video highlighting the Golden Dome’s potential to secure America’s future. The scale of this endeavor is immense, likened by General Michael Guetlein, vice chief of space operations for the U.S. Space Force, to the historic Manhattan Project due to the extensive coordination and resources it demands.

Unlike Israel’s Iron Dome, which is tailored for short-range threats over small areas, the Golden Dome must cover the vast expanse of the United States. This necessitates the integration of cutting-edge technologies, including space-based sensors and interceptors, to ensure comprehensive nationwide protection.

While the initiative is promising, it is not without its challenges. Concerns have been raised by Senator Maria Cantwell regarding the potential sale of wireless spectrum currently held by the Pentagon. She cautions that such sales could compromise national security by affecting critical radar systems essential for the Golden Dome’s effectiveness.

Despite these potential obstacles, the Trump administration remains resolute in its pursuit of the Golden Dome project, recognizing it as a crucial measure to safeguard the nation from evolving threats. This initiative reflects a steadfast dedication to preserving the safety and freedom of American citizens, rooted in the principles of faith and patriotism that define our great nation.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

News

Georgia Blocks State Funds for Inmate Surgeries

Published

on

In a bold move to uphold traditional values and protect taxpayer dollars, Georgia has taken a decisive stand by banning the use of state funds for life-altering sex-change surgeries for inmates. This action reflects a growing effort at both state and federal levels to push back against radical gender ideology and its encroachment on societal norms.

Governor Brian Kemp, a staunch advocate for conservative principles, signed Senate Bill 185 into law, reinforcing Georgia’s commitment to fiscal responsibility and moral integrity. The bill, which passed with overwhelming support in the Republican-controlled Georgia Senate and House, prohibits the allocation of state resources for “sex reassignment surgeries or any other surgical procedures that are performed for the purpose of altering primary or secondary sex characteristics.”

This legislation is a testament to the power of faith and common sense in governance. It ensures that taxpayer dollars are not squandered on procedures that contradict the natural order. By prioritizing essential services and safeguarding the public purse, Georgia is setting a precedent for other states to follow.

The bill also addresses the use of state funds for “hormone replacement therapies” and “cosmetic procedures or prosthetics intended to alter the appearance of primary or secondary sexual characteristics.” Such measures are crucial in maintaining the integrity of the justice system and ensuring that resources are directed towards rehabilitation and public safety, rather than controversial medical interventions.

Governor Kemp’s decision aligns with efforts to preserve biological truth and protect women from the dangers of radical gender ideology.

In stark contrast, some states have spent millions of taxpayer dollars on gender procedures for inmates, highlighting a trend of prioritizing ideology over common sense. Such expenditures not only burden taxpayers but also undermine the foundational values of our society.

Furthermore, recent court rulings in other states have raised concerns about judicial overreach. For instance, a federal judge ruled that denying gender transition surgery to an inmate amounted to cruel and unusual punishment. Such decisions threaten to erode the principles of justice and accountability that are vital to our nation’s moral fabric.

Georgia’s stance is a beacon of hope for those who believe in the sanctity of life, the importance of family, and the preservation of freedom. By standing firm against the tide of progressive ideology, Georgia is championing a future where faith, family, and freedom are cherished and protected.

As we look to the future, let us remain vigilant in defending our values and ensuring that our laws reflect the timeless truths that have guided our nation since its founding. In doing so, we honor not only our heritage but also our responsibility to future generations.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Trending